Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1164220040160010079
Journal of Korean Society for Radiotherapeutic Technology
2004 Volume.16 No. 1 p.79 ~ p.89
A Comparative Study on the Quality of Living for Therapeutic Cancer and Hospiece Patients


Lee Dong-Soo

Kim Jong-Deog
Abstract
This study carried a comparative analysis of quality of living perceived by cancer and hospiece patients who received radiotheraphy, and influential factors in order to provide basic data for nursing goals and establishment of strategy. The subjects of the study were 50 cancer patients who were more than twenty years old and was receiving radiotheraphy in therapeutic radiology department of C university hospital, and fourteen hospiece patients who were in J hospital in Gwangju. They were conveniently sampled according to the selection standard, and researchers personally interviewed them using questionnaire and patient scripts to obtain necessary data. The results were presented as follows: 1. When cancer and hospiece patients were examined demographically, the number of 60 year-old patients were the most. The subjects whose marriage period was more than thirty-one years were the most. In medical expense, more than of the patients bore their expenses themselves. 2. When disease-related characteristics of the cancer and pospiece patients were exmained, more than of the patients had experience of being in hospital, and more than experienced operation. However, for prevalence period, of the cancer patients had less than six months, and of the hospiece patients had more than two years. 3. For physical symptoms of cancer patients, had fatigue, had loss of appetite, and had loss of weight while for the hospiece patients, had loss of weight, and had fatigue and loss of appetite. For the cancer patients, had swelling, and had bleeding, For the hospiece patients, had change in skin, and had diarrhea. 4. Mean score of the cancer subjects were as follows: family support, social support, emotional and spiritual support, physical symptoms, and periods were 3.87, 2.88, 3.10, 2.80, and 2.94 respectively. Those of the hospiece patients were 3.80, 1.96, 1.58, 2.64 and 3.24 respectively. 5. Mean score of family support of both patients were almost identical, but in character, a considerable difference was found: 3.10 and 1.58. In qualify of living, the mean score of hospiece patients was slightly lower.
KEYWORD
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information